WTF?

Oct. 26th, 2004 10:26 am
giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
[personal profile] giza
I was driving into work this morning, and got behind an SUV that had a license plate reading: LOW CARB.

I thought it was kinda cute, until I saw the driver smoking!

Eating a healthy diet ain't gonna help if you smoke like a chimney, dude. The Surgeon General says so.

(For those of you who do smoke, however... you might find this t-shirt amusing.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unciaa.livejournal.com
He might have been sarcastic and mocking the stupidity that is the Atkins diet.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
You actually expect me to /think/ before I've had morning coffee?

Silly feline. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shenryyr.livejournal.com
considering it was an SUV, yeah ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feren.livejournal.com
Hmm.

  • Lost 35 pounds on the diet (from 195 pounds to 160).
  • Have kept it off for the last 17 months.
  • Blood pressure is down (used to be hypertensive).
  • Bad cholesterol is down.
  • Good cholesterol is up.
  • Feel far better than I have in years.

If that's stupidity, I'll stay signed up k thx.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
...why not exercise? That should give you the same benefits PLUS big muscles! :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feren.livejournal.com
It's cute that you assume I don't exercise.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 04:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
If you do, then you'd be the first person I know on the Atkins diet who actually does.

Sorry, my bad.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unciaa.livejournal.com
Let me rephrase- the same thing can be achieved in far healthier ways that don't lead to the high number of people getting completely fucked up by misusing it. I lost that same amount by removing sweets from my diet and reducing the amount of fatty food and bread I ate. It wasn't fast, but neither was it potencially harmful for me because I wasn't ignoring any of the components my body needs, merely reducing the ones I was abusing.
So, yes, it can work when you apply common sense to it, but most people don't.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furahi.livejournal.com
No sweets?
Who wants to live a sour life? ;.;

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
Vice-President Cheney? Seriously, I've never seen the dude smile!

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 08:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] unciaa.livejournal.com
No sweets when _losing_ weight. I can eat them fine and not gain weight, however. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-wolffit823.livejournal.com
The license plate could have been referring to CARB emissions regulations....

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 03:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
I Googled, and it looks like CARB stands for "California Air Resources Board".

But it was a Pennsylvania plate...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tgeller.livejournal.com
I've also seen t-shirts about the

No CARB diet:

Cheney
Ashcroft
Rove
Bush

...with the red slash thingy through the names.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-27 12:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-wolffit823.livejournal.com
Yes... and many states have emissions laws that say they must adhere to the California requirements - which are set by CARB.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] furahi.livejournal.com
The T shirt reminds me of an ad for a show called "Whoppi" (with our very own Shenzi, Whoppi Goldberg) ...
She's smoking and a guy comes and tells her "You know? Second hand smoke does kill" and she replies "So do I, baby, so walk off"

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
Yeah, except that it doesn't (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/788186/posts?page=1). :-)

There's a good episode of Bullshit (http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/topics.do?topic=shs) which debunks the topic.

WTF!

Date: 2004-10-26 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] doco.livejournal.com
We at Showtime Online express our apologies; however, these pages are intended for access only from within the United States.

Are they afraid I'm going to use their web site as a weapon of mass distraction? :)


Smoke hazards.

Date: 2004-10-26 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cjthomas.livejournal.com
Yeah, except that it doesn't. :-)

I'm filing this one with the "power lines and cell phones cause cancer" studies until it's corroborated. There's ironclad proof that tobacco smoke (and most other forms of smoke, for that matter) are harmful if inhaled in significant quantity. The only question is whether the quantities involved in second-hand smoke are substantial enough to have a statistically significant effect.

This study claims "no", but I'd have to take a hard look at its methods to see exactly what it _studied_. I'm pretty sure that if I'd spent my youth in smoke-filled clubs instead of in front of a computer terminal, my risk of lung cancer would have gone up. Whether it goes up significantly from standing on a bus platform outdoors next to a smoker is more questionable, but claiming that second-hand smoke isn't a problem at _all_ is a very dangerous statement to make.

Re: Smoke hazards.

Date: 2004-10-26 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
I guess you haven't seen that Episode of "Bullshit". :-)

I'm kinda polarized about it, but that's because the episode quoted a flawed study done by some group that ended up being used as the basis for a whole bunch of other reports, and those reports have been quoted by the anti-smoking groups as "evidence". Junk science at its finest. :-)

Aaaaand, just to nitpick, *grin*, the status of power lines causing cancer isn't "not corroborated" so much as it is "thoroughly debunked". This article on Quackwatch (http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/emf.html) has a good overview of the original flawed study and subsequent studies that disproved the hypothesis.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-26 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kitsfox.livejournal.com
I saw that SUV the other day!
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

Re: heh-heh

Date: 2004-10-27 12:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
It was drawn by Taurin Fox (http://www.alphafox.furtopia.org/). If you can catch him early enough at a con, he does commissions and con badges.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-10-27 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freakylynx.livejournal.com
Fo' serious??? SUV's are low in carbs? Shit man, I gotta buy me one of thems - Dr. Atkins tells me to.

Profile

giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
Douglas Muth

April 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags