Why I hate the mailto: link
Mar. 29th, 2005 11:17 pmI just got off the phone with my TLA-impaired mother. She was having computer problems with her Mac. The main complaint was along the lines of, "I'm trying to go to my old high school's website, and when I click on some links it asks for a password and mailserver!"
After going back and forth with her for a few minutes, I realized what was happening. She was clicking on mailto: links. And since she uses Hotmail and not any sort of local mail client, it was bringing up the configuration dialogs.
Attention webmasters: mailto links are EVIL. They work in different ways on different systems. Use plaintext e-mail addresses or feedback/contact forms instead.
Now that I think of it, it would sure be nice if Firefox had a configuration option where you could choose what to do when a mailto: link is clicked. For bonus points, integration with Gmail/Hotmail/whatever would really rock my world.
After going back and forth with her for a few minutes, I realized what was happening. She was clicking on mailto: links. And since she uses Hotmail and not any sort of local mail client, it was bringing up the configuration dialogs.
Attention webmasters: mailto links are EVIL. They work in different ways on different systems. Use plaintext e-mail addresses or feedback/contact forms instead.
Now that I think of it, it would sure be nice if Firefox had a configuration option where you could choose what to do when a mailto: link is clicked. For bonus points, integration with Gmail/Hotmail/whatever would really rock my world.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 04:49 am (UTC)I use Firefox & Thunderbird & gmail...
I click a mailto, it pops up with a new thunderbird message, and sends it via gmail.
I see no problem... lol ^.^ just my $0.02
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 04:49 am (UTC)I hate feedback forms, because they don't leave tracking in my outbox.
And putting up an address without making it also a link is as smart as putting an elevator next to the stairs...and leaving off the button.
Comments? Mail me.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 04:58 am (UTC)Mailto links are NOT evil. They are good. Very, very good. Just because your relatives have to copy/paste doesn't mean I have to also.
By the way, you can set up Outlook to communicate with her Hotmail account.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 02:58 pm (UTC)But what happens when the link is something like this (mailto:doug.muthATgmailDOTcom)? In this example, it's not clear that one needs to copy and paste. All the end user knows is that they clicked on it and something bad happened. That's just a bad user interface. And it's not like this problem is new, either.
> By the way, you can set up Outlook to communicate with her Hotmail account.
She is on a Mac, so I'm not even sure if Outlook is available. And if it were, well... I think you know my feelings toward Microsoft. I'm not going to inflict one of their products on my mother.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 03:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 10:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 10:17 pm (UTC)But that's the whole point of my little rant. I don't like that the assumption is made by web browsers is that you have a working mail client on your machine. Case in point, I have two computers at the office. One of them has an e-mail client which I read corporate e-mail on, the other does not.
I think that the extension that
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 10:08 pm (UTC)In Hotmail's defense, though, they have far less than the average amount of evil that is present in Microsoft. They squash spammers, they don't send spam, they don't have a new security hole found every freakin' week, so on and so forth. Probably something to do with the original backend being BSD-based.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 05:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 05:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 03:00 pm (UTC)I just think that the whole mailto: thing is a bad idea for the reasons I outlined above.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-31 05:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-31 05:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 05:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 07:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-30 12:37 pm (UTC)Thank you, I've always felt the same way.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-31 05:41 am (UTC)I think IE does something like this, particularly for Hotmail, but I could be wrong.