Well, I didn't see that coming
Jun. 2nd, 2005 10:03 pmBible-belt town bans blasphemy
And there I was, thinking that the USA had a monopoly on the Jesus Freaks. Whoops, did I just take the Lord's name in vain again? Silly me.
AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - The name of the Lord may no longer be taken in vain in the Dutch village of Staphorst.
Staphorst, in the so-called Dutch "bible belt" of eastern towns where religion holds sway, approved a ban on swearing by 13-4 council votes.
But the caveat that swearing is not banned when it is an expression of the constitutional freedom of speech may make it difficult to punish offenders.
"A ban on swearing can be seen as a signal," the council's proposal said, adding a change in moral values was needed to address the underlying problem.
Past swearing bans in bible-belt villages were declared in violation of the right to free expression in 1986. One other town has such a ban -- Reimerswaal, in the southwestern province of Zeeland.
The Dutch association against swearing, which runs national billboard campaigns to admonish the bad-mouthed Dutch, says the Bible outlaws swearing.
"Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain," it quotes Exodus 20:7.
And there I was, thinking that the USA had a monopoly on the Jesus Freaks. Whoops, did I just take the Lord's name in vain again? Silly me.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 02:21 am (UTC)Whoops! I did it yet again!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 09:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 03:24 am (UTC)Oop..
Ghod Verdamma
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 03:27 am (UTC)And don't forget Italy, where an author is currently on trial for blashpheming Islam in one of her books.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 04:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 04:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 04:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 07:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 02:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 02:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 07:43 am (UTC)A while back their political party tried to push the ID-laws through the government (Intelligent Design), but even during the debate it seemed a lost cause, especially when the biggest Christian fraction (the CDA) told them 'this was just absurd'. They filed a motion and it was rejected with 147 against 3 votes.
Fortunately even the CDA sees separation between church and state as one of the basic principles of the Dutch state.
Seeyas :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 01:54 pm (UTC)Oh lordy, we have that going on in the State of Kansas right now. What's really sad is that the state school board is RUN by the Jesus freaks, so the scientists who were going to testify ended up boycotting the hearings because of their one-sidedness.
http://www.toptechnews.com/news/National-Science-Groups-Boycott-Kansas-Evolution-Hearings/story.xhtml?story_id=013001C5ZV5W
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-03 10:50 am (UTC)