giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
[personal profile] giza
http://moon.google.com/

In honor of the first Moon landing, which took place 36 years ago today, Google has used their mapping technology to make a map of the moon's surface available. It includes the landing locations of Apollo 11, 12, and 14 through 17.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sirfox.livejournal.com
have you zoomed all the way in yet for a closer look?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] antimon.livejournal.com
damnit you beat me to telling him:)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
Oh yes. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 02:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xydexx.livejournal.com
This is why Google's stock is up to $300. Because they keep doing awesome stuff like this.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
Oh yeah.

I do web development for a living, and I was totally blown away when Gmail came out. They used Javascript in ways that it had never been used before, and did a damn good job at it too.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lionman.livejournal.com
I wish the images were of sufficient quality to see the equipment we left behind.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
I think that would take some really powerful telescopes. :-/

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lionman.livejournal.com
Have you seen the images that Hubble has produced of things light-years away? C'mon, the moon's not -that- far away. I suspect no one has felt it was necessary to point the Hubble at the moon. :-/

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
I'm talking out of my arse here, but maybe the optics in Hubble are calibrated to focus on stuff that's thousands of light years away and not stuff that's only thousands of miles away.

If the two sets of optics were interchangable, I imagine that the NSA's spy satellites could be turned around and used to look at the stars instead of Hubble. ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thraxarious.livejournal.com
I think its mostly time, as there are so many people who want to get some time on hubble before its 86'ed. One Telescope, tens of thousands of researchers.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyriljackal.livejournal.com
The reason they don't is because nothing is there. All just conspiracy. ;x) *laughs*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lionman.livejournal.com
Yeah, yeah..my mother commented just that when I spoke to her this morning about the moon landing.

:-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyriljackal.livejournal.com
I'm sure they happened, but damn we need some new pictures to slam them in the face. Even if to see 'what does 30 year old stuff on the moon look like today?'
Probably pretty good.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
There's a great episode of Penn and Teller's Bullshit on conspiracies, including the moon landings.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyriljackal.livejournal.com
I love Bullshit ;x)
My favorite is The Bible, and The End of the World ones.
People are absoultely nuts.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lionman.livejournal.com
I -totally- agree. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyriljackal.livejournal.com
The best place to put non spoiling stuff woud be the moon. Store it till we need it. ;x) Like a giant refrigerator.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lionman.livejournal.com
Perhaps. But, I think you'd have other things you'd have to deal with then. But, it's an interesting idea, nonetheless.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cyriljackal.livejournal.com
*stores his transformers on the dark side of the moon*

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lionman.livejournal.com
Lionman is old school TF. None of this new crap. Die-cast...a lost art. ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xoagray.livejournal.com
This is officially some pretty cool shit! Then again, so is Gmail. I don't really know What's going on with Google, but they've been coming up with some really neat stuff, so it's cool to keep an eye on. Funny, when I first heard of Google, all it was was a search engine. But honestly, I'd not be too surprised if it was the next Yahoo.

*wags tail*
Xoa

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 03:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giza.livejournal.com
Google hires some amazingly smart people. Check out The Google File System (http://labs.google.com/papers/gfs.html) sometime. The way they implement it is pretty impressive, and some of the design decisions made in it show that the people there really know their stuff.

Google will never be another Yahoo, because Yahoo tries to do everything. Google, on the other hand, is much more conservative about areas that it goes into, but it tries to be the best product in the areas that it does enter.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-07-20 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xoagray.livejournal.com
That's for sure, they do have some smart folks working for Google, but honstely, I could see Google getting into a lot more things and ending up similar to Yahoo. Not the same, but similar.

*wags tail*
Xoa

Profile

giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
Douglas Muth

April 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags