Despite making some very interesting points, the unfortunate fact is the respondants that popped up following. Many of them overlooked it as a purpose of showing "Hey, we're all hypocrites. If we're going to ignore and choose what rules we follow, then we have no right to choose specific ones to disclude people", or at least that's what I grasped from it. Most of them just popped in and went to discredit the guy.
This is the kind of thing I'd love to send to my dad... if I didn't think he'd read the first paragraph and delete the e-mail, thinking the guy was some crackpot gay activist.
My dad's pretty anal when it comes to "the known interpretations" of the Bible.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-02 06:20 am (UTC)Either way, biblical arguing just hurts my brain.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-02 09:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-02 05:51 pm (UTC)My dad's pretty anal when it comes to "the known interpretations" of the Bible.
He wouldn't have disowned me otherwise.