(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-03 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kellic.livejournal.com
Hmmm a thought. Lets get computers that can manage the X and Z plains before we throw Y into the mix.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-03 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cuprohastes.livejournal.com
I've seen a video of a computer controlled plane landing, taken from inside the cockpit. The pilot got some serious heebie jeebies, but the landing was fine.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-03 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elfasi.livejournal.com
Yeah that's the old Airbus crash thing, very old, pretty dramatic. The pilot was flying too low and the aircraft computer thought it was coming into land, with the inevitable results..

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-04 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taral.livejournal.com
I had to hunt a bit, and was quite happy to see that this is from 1988.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-03 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drzarron.livejournal.com
Old Video, New Voice Over.

What Elfasi said, pilot error on landing (My mistake, was thinking another simular event).

Lots of planes fly the world 99% of the time controlled by computer and there's never been a major event concerning them.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-04 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] entropicana.livejournal.com
It's so horrible, so much death... at least I assume a lot of death...

And yet the stately way it flies into the trees, nose in the air, is hilarious. It's like watching a British butler solemnly and deliberately walk into a wall.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-04 05:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] khakiwolf.livejournal.com
"This is the first fully automated plane flown by a computer."

*CRASH*

Not anymore. =)

Computers flying airplanes

Date: 2006-03-05 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] justincheetah.livejournal.com
This is more of a comment about other comments here than a specific response to Giza's post about the problems Airbus had early on with fly by wire.

To an extent, yes, computers frequently fly airplanes. It really depends on what one considers 'flying the airplane'. In an Airbus (except one), there is no direct connection between the pilots and the aircraft. Computers take pilot input as a strong suggestion, then decide how to actually manipulate aerodynamic control surfaces to maneuver the aircraft. Most have heard of this as "Fly By Wire."

Outside Airbus, and with notable exception of the Boeing 777, "computers flying the airplane" could be written "computers simulating pilot input to the controls". An autopilot in most commercial aircraft takes information from navigation computers and drives servos to mechanically control the yolk (stick) as if a pilot was physically manipulating the yoke. The same goes for autoland computers. At least in these systems, if the computer(s) start going on the fritz, the pilot has the option to regain physical control of the aircraft. Fly by wire does not give this option.

For the record, computers (autopilot or otherwise) do very little of my flying except in long range cruise. I prefer to do everything else myself.

Profile

giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
Douglas Muth

April 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags