Article About Furry
Apr. 18th, 2003 01:11 pmhttp://www.laalternativepress.com/v02n01/features/williamson.php
This one wasn't so bad. It went to considerable lengths to talk about some of the sensationalism that has taken place in articles about furry. Here's a quote from the end
This one wasn't so bad. It went to considerable lengths to talk about some of the sensationalism that has taken place in articles about furry. Here's a quote from the end
The average furry is a lot like the average Trekkie: he just likes his fictional humans crossed with animals instead of Vulcans. Furry is simply a camaraderie based on mutual interests. Just as Dungeons and Dragons gamers love orcs and trolls, Pagans love faeries and nymphs, or as alterna-nerds love every band on Sub-Pop, Furries love their fox- and tiger-men. And when a glossy magazine reports that Furry is only about perversion, it misses the target in the same way that stories about things like raves and Burning Man typically do.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 10:32 am (UTC)"These conversations are typical of what one will find at Furry conventions, scheduled alongside social events like dances and talent shows. Scattered here and there in private hotel rooms, one might also find places like “The Nursery” — where adult babies can get diapered — and Fursuit dry-humping orgies, or Plushie parties, where people who disdain or can’t find human sexual partners stick their organs into an SPH (strategically placed hole) torn into a carnival prize raccoon."
It's the same game as always, they're just hiding behind the guise of pretending to defend us.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 11:26 am (UTC)I didn't perceive them as "defending us", though. I thought it was a more balanced article (as opposed to past coverage), which is generally an indicator of good journalism, IMHO.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 12:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 12:28 pm (UTC)"Not surprisingly, the media always seem to get it wrong." (Not always; but in this case, yeah.)
Date: 2003-04-18 10:37 am (UTC)"[T]he media have earned the Furries’ mistrust by getting a lot wrong."
But don't worry... an article portraying Furries as "disenfranchised nerds" will certainly get their trust back. -:)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 10:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-20 01:22 am (UTC)Actuallyly, my first thought at seeing the picture was "at least the costumes aren't embarrassingly bad". You're right though. I would never ever pose for a picture with my head off unless the picture was for myself only and I was playing some high-profile or special character.
I have to agree with
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-20 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 11:32 am (UTC)The article _was_ balanced and I thought rather honest about things, the good and the bad. If you want a spokesman to ignore the reality of the fandom and only say what you want said, well, I hear Baghdad Bob is out of a job now...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 11:53 am (UTC)He's on LJ now. His username is
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-18 11:07 pm (UTC)Right here.
Next question?
Regards,
-Deuce of FurryMUCK