giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
[personal profile] giza
[livejournal.com profile] theweaselking tells us that Wegman's will let you email their bakery an order for a cake, and include a custom message to display on the cake.

That's all good, but their software fails to do proper validation on the custom message for the cake. So, if you send them a Microsoft's propietary "HTML" (more like bastardized XML, but I digress), this is the result:

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simbab.livejournal.com
ROFL.

That is HILARIOUS. I literally have tears in my eyes.

Why yes, I am losing it. :-P

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbadger.livejournal.com
That is so great!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 05:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sagejackal.livejournal.com
ROFFLES

Oh, snap! That is, by far, the best cake I have ever seen! XD

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nikvulper.livejournal.com
I want a piece of cake with broken code on it!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jonesybunny.livejournal.com
Haha! Great!

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolffit.livejournal.com
But.. those are perfectly valid (syntactically) HTML comments... Wegman's HTML renderer is broken.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbadger.livejournal.com
The correct form for comments is <-- followed by at least one white space character, although Wegman's renderer should handle that common error. But if you look at google, Wegman's only supports CML -- Cake mark up language.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 12:31 am (UTC)
ext_79259: (Default)
From: [identity profile] greenreaper.livejournal.com
They have a ! after the < (http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/wilbur/misc/comment.html)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-24 02:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jbadger.livejournal.com
That is correct hmmm I wonder where my ! went?

In any case you still need a white space so
<!----> is invalid but <!-- --> is valid.

When I ran <!----> through an html validator it flagged it as an error. If designed a html rendered engine I think both forms should be looked upon as valid. There is so much out there that is no valid html. I never found a reference that states in un lit and lit phosphor if the white space is needed.

references html 4.01

I know it is defined in xhtml someplace but ehhh not searching.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-01-22 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zorinlynx.livejournal.com
Ooops.

Funny how computers HAVE to be used for everything these days. What happened to just picking up a squirty thing and writing whatever you want using frosting?

Sigh...

Profile

giza: Giza White Mage (Default)
Douglas Muth

April 2012

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags