Please QA your code, people
Jan. 22nd, 2007 11:06 amThat's all good, but their software fails to do proper validation on the custom message for the cake. So, if you send them a Microsoft's propietary "HTML" (more like bastardized XML, but I digress), this is the result:
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 04:20 pm (UTC)That is HILARIOUS. I literally have tears in my eyes.
Why yes, I am losing it. :-P
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 04:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 05:30 pm (UTC)Oh, snap! That is, by far, the best cake I have ever seen! XD
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 06:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 06:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 06:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 07:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-24 12:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-24 02:50 am (UTC)In any case you still need a white space so
<!----> is invalid but <!-- --> is valid.
When I ran <!----> through an html validator it flagged it as an error. If designed a html rendered engine I think both forms should be looked upon as valid. There is so much out there that is no valid html. I never found a reference that states in un lit and lit phosphor if the white space is needed.
references html 4.01
I know it is defined in xhtml someplace but ehhh not searching.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 06:47 pm (UTC)Funny how computers HAVE to be used for everything these days. What happened to just picking up a squirty thing and writing whatever you want using frosting?
Sigh...