Huh. That site you linked reads a bit like a personal/apocryphal tale of woe. IOW, take it with a grain of salt. It's a personal experience, not a CVE bulletin.
But at any rate, this is exactly why you need several extensions to Firefox like Adblock, Greasemonkey, CustomizeGoogle, and (most importantly) NoScript. I have thought, in the past, that perhaps NoScript was overkill but then you read about stuff like this that NoScript almost always will stop, and then I realize it's really better to have it.
Adblock and Greasemonkey are now available for the Firefox-based MicroB browser on my Internet tablet, if they'd add NoScript to the webaddons project it would be perfect. :)
I see my wisdom in not having any dealings with Google's "Free mail if we get to mine it for anything we want and send you and your friends spam" service was correct.
If (and this is a BIG if) Google could have done anything differently, they might have modified Gmail so that it is a little stricter about checking the referrer on a form submission. They've apparently done this now, because the exploit no longer works.
Really, the moral of the story here is to be careful what sites you visit.
Though, I'd like to see a FireFox plugin that more carefully guards against cross-site form submissions.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-27 06:57 pm (UTC)But at any rate, this is exactly why you need several extensions to Firefox like Adblock, Greasemonkey, CustomizeGoogle, and (most importantly) NoScript. I have thought, in the past, that perhaps NoScript was overkill but then you read about stuff like this that NoScript almost always will stop, and then I realize it's really better to have it.
Adblock and Greasemonkey are now available for the Firefox-based MicroB browser on my Internet tablet, if they'd add NoScript to the webaddons project it would be perfect. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-27 07:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-27 07:24 pm (UTC)Uh, that's not what happened here.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-27 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-27 08:12 pm (UTC)http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/google-gmail-e-mail-hijack-technique/
If (and this is a BIG if) Google could have done anything differently, they might have modified Gmail so that it is a little stricter about checking the referrer on a form submission. They've apparently done this now, because the exploit no longer works.
Really, the moral of the story here is to be careful what sites you visit.
Though, I'd like to see a FireFox plugin that more carefully guards against cross-site form submissions.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-27 08:21 pm (UTC)*points to his earlier comment about NoScript*
damnit
Date: 2007-12-28 01:12 am (UTC)Re: damnit
Date: 2007-12-28 01:15 am (UTC)Would that explain the zombie porn that just showed up in my inbox?