How's that Google PageRank, Lisa?
Apr. 8th, 2008 10:09 amI think this is a prime example of how Google's PageRank has a bit of a democratic bent to it:

Generally speaking, when you type in someone's name, the very first result in Google is the person's website. Do it for just about any politician, or even people with individual blogs, and you'll see this happen. It also works for corporate entities and non-profits. So for Lisa Paolino's official site to NOT come up when people search for her name is quite significant. I think it's rather telling when a candidate's scandal comes up higher than their campaign's official website.
Moral of the story: Lisa Paolino can get all the monetary donations she wants, but money won't buy a higher PageRank.
In related news, it seems that lawn signs for Daylin Leach and Lance Rogers have been disappearing, yet Lisa's remain untouched. Random acts of vandalism? Or an attempt to sabotage her opponents? I guess we'll find out soon enough on this one.
Generally speaking, when you type in someone's name, the very first result in Google is the person's website. Do it for just about any politician, or even people with individual blogs, and you'll see this happen. It also works for corporate entities and non-profits. So for Lisa Paolino's official site to NOT come up when people search for her name is quite significant. I think it's rather telling when a candidate's scandal comes up higher than their campaign's official website.
Moral of the story: Lisa Paolino can get all the monetary donations she wants, but money won't buy a higher PageRank.
In related news, it seems that lawn signs for Daylin Leach and Lance Rogers have been disappearing, yet Lisa's remain untouched. Random acts of vandalism? Or an attempt to sabotage her opponents? I guess we'll find out soon enough on this one.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 02:26 pm (UTC)Wouldn't the glue dry?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 03:07 pm (UTC)Odds are that it's just the usual idiots who seem to pop up in any election who think stealing the signs for candidates running against theres is a novel, good idea.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 03:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 03:46 pm (UTC)But yeah, for a domain containing the search query to come up third is pretty significant.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 04:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 10:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 11:26 pm (UTC)After 48 hours the police come, take fingerprints, and arrest everybody they can match, and require that the workers who are suposed to set them up be fingerprinted.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-08 11:32 pm (UTC)And I think the whole fingerprint people working in political campaigns thing might meet just a bit of resistance. I'm assuming that was sarcasm though. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-09 09:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-09 11:06 am (UTC)She fucked up, and now she pays the price.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-09 01:13 pm (UTC)> And the story about Lisa Paolino and the firefighter photo is all over the
> internet right now, hence the pagerank thing.
Not really, no. Googling for it (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ned=us&q=paolino+fallon&sa=N&tab=nw) only really shows the letter on Scribd and my LJ entry (http://giza.livejournal.com/506789.html).
> She fucked up, and now she pays the price.
Agreed!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-04-20 08:31 pm (UTC)