Heath Shake? More like Death Shake!
Sep. 19th, 2008 07:58 pmThanks for pointing this out,
lockemaison:

That's pretty much a day's worth of calories right there, in that one shake.
I'm amazed places can get away selling this stuff. I know that people have to take responsibility for what they eat, but I think there has to be some accountability for the companies that sell this crap, too. I'd be surprised if 1 in 100 customers who consume that shake have any idea how bad it is.
That's pretty much a day's worth of calories right there, in that one shake.
I'm amazed places can get away selling this stuff. I know that people have to take responsibility for what they eat, but I think there has to be some accountability for the companies that sell this crap, too. I'd be surprised if 1 in 100 customers who consume that shake have any idea how bad it is.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:08 am (UTC)I guess that makes you the one guy who read the label! :-P
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:12 am (UTC)...
... I'm a big fat guy who got that way by eating too much, and that's way beyond the beyonds.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:15 am (UTC)I mean, what if i know how bad it is and I want it anyway? Don't I have the right to eat shitty if I want to?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:17 am (UTC)Your icon kicks ass, though. NOM NOM NOM. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:03 am (UTC)I don't mean Baskin Robbins in particular, I mean crappy food in general.
We constantly discuss the topic over lunch here; about whether bad food should be prohibited, restaurants taking accountability for selling it (which would more or less mean they would stop selling it anyway, since they are not going to pay for pace makers or open heart surgery ;P); and how that conflicts with the right of people that want to eat that food anyway to eat it.
Should they make you sign a waiver? Should they post pictures of fat people on the cup, like they do for cigarettes in some places?
The easy answer is they should make healthier food. To some degree that is possible, they can fry food with better oils, and not reuse the oil 1000 times; they can handle meat better --not to mention use better meats--, add less sugar to desserts.
But that's only possible only up to a certain degree. You can't make a Heath milk shake a lot healthier than what you're showing, and still have it be... well, delicious*.
Take the deep fried Twinkie as an example, Twinkies are bad to begin with, then deep fry it and you make it worse... Yet, if someone wants a deep fried Twinkie, there's no way to get around it. I personally consider that is an abomination, the deep frying doesn't add anything that I appreciate to the Twinkie, but a lot of people like them and, while they probably shouldn't eat them, they have the right to do so.
Another solution is taxing crappy food, but that's not really fair either. It might encourage companies to find healthier ways to produce the same food item, but again you can only get so far with that...
I'm starting to ramble, so I better stop :P
Your mileage may vary, not everybody finds a sugar overload to be delicious
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:20 am (UTC)But, even if consumers are informed, a percentage of them are still going to go ahead and choose badly. You really can't do much about that. The Heath Shake you can make "healthier" by not serving it as a 32 effing ounce drink -- yet it doesn't seem very rational to tell Baskin-Robbins, "Sorry, you're legally prohibited from selling it in a cup bigger than 16 ounces."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 03:31 am (UTC)People should be responsible for their own actions, but they should be given fair warning and encouraged to do the right thing. Sure, McDonnalds can sell the uber monstro krispy Kreme dipped burger bigger than your heart becomes because of Cardiomegaly. But, push and focus on eating right, don't just add one or two "lite" meal items.
Its just going to happen, you keep the product the same, but jazz some stuff up on TV and suddenly it sells more, even if it has the same risks to obesity and heart disease. Its Human nature.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 03:33 pm (UTC)This is the main reason why, although I'll try to eat healthier most of the time, I fail to compromise on certain foods. There's no such thing as good lowfat cheese, for instance. Well, as far as my tastes are concerned, anyway. The lowfat version always seems to taste awful and look like chewed plastic in runny water.
Yet I won't drink any milk that's not skim. Funny how my tastes work...
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 03:11 am (UTC)Sodium is a big problem in foods in America. I actually turn down a lot of food because of its sodium content.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 05:02 am (UTC)I recall reading somewhere (can't remember where, sorry!) that increasing potassium intake helps counteract increased sodium intake. That's why I eat 2 bananas per day.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 05:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 02:10 pm (UTC)A few years back i started to see my blood pressure creep up like many others in my family. Now I know I am fat and not so in shape but I didn't want to be on blood pressure meds starting in my 20s ( i know 2 people that are )
After a few weeks there was much i didn't want to try to eat because all i could taste was the salt.
Oh and the good news getting closer to the 30 mark and blood pressure in check.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:48 am (UTC)Maybe on Consumerist (http://consumerist.com/5052633/baskin-robbins-death-shake-has-2300-calories)? And then you took a trip back in time? :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 12:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:43 am (UTC)It's so the person's ribs don't break when they have CPR done on them following the heart attack. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 04:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 01:49 am (UTC)32 "fluid ounces" are 946 ml in proper SI.
850*9,46=8,041 kcal.
See? It could be much worse. :P
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 02:36 am (UTC)Whatever happened to a scoop of ice cream or a regular cup of coffee?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 05:08 am (UTC)Here's the problem: things like coffee became very cheap, because everybody offered them, there wasn't much to distinguish a cup of coffee, so prices had to go down to be competitive.
But that wasn't good enough for shareholders, they wanted profits! So businesses came up with different ways to "add value" so that they could charge more and make a bigger profit. This is how all of those insane coffee addons came about. Same thing for other commodity products such as cereal (think Frosted Flakes and breakfast bars here).
So yeah, there's a definitely "consumer beware" theme here, because as we can see, companies will sell you what they think they can get away with.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 03:30 am (UTC)Oh, btw, those instant Udon bowls you can buy at Asian marts have 2800 to 3200 mg of sodium. I nearly tossed it in the trash whe I noticed it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 03:46 am (UTC)Classify a meal item able to have at most 1/3 daily content of the 'bad' stuff if it fits the food pyramid properly. If it has to have more items to fill the pyramid, it must allow for those in its content. So many items are a 'meal' item, but if you look, Whoops! that can is actually 2 or 2.5 servings. If you eat the whole thing you actually are taking in a lot more fat, salt, and other things you should cut down on, maybe your whole daily intake.
with snacks and entres, again, fit it to our dietary health info, what we should be eating, over that, its taxed.
doesn't mean "cut out all this", also have it have to have the right bits of vitamins, fiber, and protien to get classifications. The idea should be to make it financially desireably to sell good food, instead of cutting the bottom out with crap and dessicated salt cheese powder.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 04:11 am (UTC)Bottom line: I couldn't eat it now; I once would have, in spite of the labelling .....
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 04:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 05:08 am (UTC)Like, with a needle in the arm?
That is SO hard core. ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 05:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 03:31 pm (UTC)It's a heart attack that you can buy at a restaurant. Fries, gravy and cheese curds.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-20 02:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-21 02:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-21 03:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-21 04:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-21 09:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-03 03:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-07 06:05 am (UTC)(Actually no I wouldn't. Coffee flavor, meh.)