![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The backstory:
I remember back in the 90s when I used to read Scouting Magazine, I would see these awful editorials going on and on (and on...) about the "gay agenda", and how those eeeeevil gays and atheists were trying to "take over" Scouting and force their values on everyone else. I was years away from thinking of myself as "gay" back then, but still those editorials left a really bad taste in my mouth.
The funny thing is that the local troops that I dealt with when I was in scouting (I'm an Eagle Scout) really didn't care one way or another about sexual orientation or religious preferences. When we were on camping trips and went to religious services, the guys who didn't go to church were merely dragged along to whatever service the leaders felt like taking them to. Nobody cared. A childhood friend of mine told me a few years back that his troop was the same way, but with gays. There were several gays in his troop, and the leaders didn't care.
It's such a shame, that while Boy Scouting is a great program for the boys, its executives are completely out of touch, and rotten to the core.
City of Philadelphia: "Uh, you know that office space we're letting you have for free?"
Boy Scouts: "Yeah?"
City of Philadelphia: Well, we got this little problem with you discriminating against gays. It's discriminatory, and our policies prevent us from letting you have this office space for free.
Boy Scouts: It's our organization, and we'll run it how we like.
City of Philadelphia: Look, if you want to discriminate against gays, that's your business, but we're going to have to ask that you pay us fair market value starting on June 1st, or vacate the building. Continuing to let you occupy that building free of rent would violate our city's policies.
Boy Scouts: Fuck you.
City of Philadelphia: Fine, just get out.
Boy Scouts: We're not going anywhere. BTW, we're suing you now, so that we can stay here and continue to discriminate against gays.
So, yeah... I wish I could say that this kind of behavior is a first from the Boy Scouts, but they have a long standing policy of being horribly bigoted and intolerant when it comes to gays, atheists, and pretty much anyone else who doesn't fit into their narrow view of the way things should be.Boy Scouts: "Yeah?"
City of Philadelphia: Well, we got this little problem with you discriminating against gays. It's discriminatory, and our policies prevent us from letting you have this office space for free.
Boy Scouts: It's our organization, and we'll run it how we like.
City of Philadelphia: Look, if you want to discriminate against gays, that's your business, but we're going to have to ask that you pay us fair market value starting on June 1st, or vacate the building. Continuing to let you occupy that building free of rent would violate our city's policies.
Boy Scouts: Fuck you.
City of Philadelphia: Fine, just get out.
Boy Scouts: We're not going anywhere. BTW, we're suing you now, so that we can stay here and continue to discriminate against gays.
I remember back in the 90s when I used to read Scouting Magazine, I would see these awful editorials going on and on (and on...) about the "gay agenda", and how those eeeeevil gays and atheists were trying to "take over" Scouting and force their values on everyone else. I was years away from thinking of myself as "gay" back then, but still those editorials left a really bad taste in my mouth.
The funny thing is that the local troops that I dealt with when I was in scouting (I'm an Eagle Scout) really didn't care one way or another about sexual orientation or religious preferences. When we were on camping trips and went to religious services, the guys who didn't go to church were merely dragged along to whatever service the leaders felt like taking them to. Nobody cared. A childhood friend of mine told me a few years back that his troop was the same way, but with gays. There were several gays in his troop, and the leaders didn't care.
It's such a shame, that while Boy Scouting is a great program for the boys, its executives are completely out of touch, and rotten to the core.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 04:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 04:05 am (UTC)Heck ! Here that kind of discrimination from a social club would be unnacceptable (especially since it's funded federally) and ILLEGAL .
All the scout organisation people are showing right now is that they are a bunch of unreasonable pig-headed chauvinists to the population.
I mean , losing a building because you're so onset to hate gay people .. that's sad .. and creepy!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 04:19 am (UTC)Back in the 1990s, there were some cases where companies that were donating to the BSA became upset about the whole gay discrimination thing. They asked the BSA to knock it off, the BSA refused, so the companies pulled (or threatened to pull) their donations. The BSA's response? You guessed it: they started screaming about the Gay Agenda and how these companies were simply awful for trying to force their views on the Boy Scouts.
It's like the inmates are running the asylum.
(Then there's the stories of politics my father used to tell me when he was a District Commissioner...)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 04:14 am (UTC)Awesome, no? What a completely outmoded organization. Much to the displeasure of my parents I almost always refer to the BSA as The Brownshirts.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 07:03 am (UTC)They can't stand to be told they can't have their cake and eat it too, just like those people of privilege who think they're not of privilege, they have to learn that there are others who don't get or aren't entitled to such a sweet deal. Any attempt to bring these people back to planet earth is seen as the "Gay Agenda" or "Liberal Agenda". Its just more whining.
I do hope that the BSA is wrestled out of the greedy crazy hands of a select few in the Mormon church and returned to more honorable hands. There are some good things about scouts, and its the fault of those up top who corrupted it.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 12:25 pm (UTC)Maybe they should seek out office space from some other right-wing, backwards organization instead of trying to stick around where they are not wanted.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 12:28 pm (UTC)Except that, you know, they could keep their meeting space.
Wonder if there's a Gay Eagle Scout organization. Might be worth looking into, or even putting together.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 09:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 12:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 12:51 pm (UTC)Yeah, there were little jokes 'n comments now and then about them, but that was all. In hindsight, the acceptance was kind of surprising considering the guys that were in the troop. It was almost like a scouting version of the Dirty Dozen. Heck, I learned how to rake a lock to open it from one of the guys in my patrol.
The BSA nowadays seems to try to take the stance of being a victim whenever some company or organization calls them on their policies.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 12:53 pm (UTC)Like most things, that this particular action by the city isn't entirely black and white. Depending on the judge and the jury (they're demanding a jury trial), the lawsuit may have some legs.
By the way, I agree entirely that the discrimination policies of the BSA are reprehensible. Nonetheless, we live in a country where even scoundrels are entitled to due process.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 01:07 pm (UTC)But yeah, let 'em have their due process. I think by going nuclear and launching this lawsuit, they're going to just get more negative attention out of it. Oh well.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 01:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 02:26 pm (UTC)The Cradle of Liberty Council agreed with the nondiscrimination policy - in fact, they adopted a council nondiscrimination policy in 2003, see http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,303280,00.html
The National Council ordered them to revoke it, to the point of sending a Cease and Desist letter!
The Wikipedia article mentions more, though the Philadelphia Inquirer article concerning the Cease and Desist is unfortunately a broken link at this time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_Liberty_Council
It's unfortunate that this situation is being forced into the courts, but it was inevitable. Either the CoL continues to discriminate in order to receive funding from National, or they get kicked out of National and are forced to become a local camping club. You can't have a "satellite" Boy Scouts organization, you'll be violating the IP held by National.
The BSA sucks rocks, I hated all my Boy Scouting experiences (though Cub Scouts was excellent). However, I cannot fault the CoL for their myriad attempts to appease all parties in this situation and only as a last resort being forced to succumb to the pressure and have the decision made in the courts.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 02:35 pm (UTC)"Throughout my youth I went to Catholic School and was educated by nuns. At no time during my education, nor since, have I been inclined to become a nun."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-28 03:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-29 03:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-29 05:55 pm (UTC)Anybody wanna guess who has to risk their own safety when scouts get lost in caves?
My friends in the NSS.(One day I'll be among the rescuers.)
Also, they are disrespectful to the fragile ecosystems.
Real cavers have a creed:
"Take nothing but pictures, leave nothing but (carefully placed) footprints, kill nothing but time."
Sorry if this was off topic, I've just wanted to say that for quite a while.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-05-29 05:59 pm (UTC)I also don't know what you mean about ecological damage. In the Boy Scouts, we had our own "outdoor code", and were pretty hard core about it when camping. I know that my troop would regularly and religiously police the campsite after all the equipment was packed up but before we left, and picked up anything that even resembled litter.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-03 04:50 pm (UTC)I'm not saying that the organization as a whole is maliciously defacing caves. I believe the damage is due to ignorance on the part of the scoutmasters.(who probably mean well)
If you wish, I can send you a few links that further expand upon the issue.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-03 05:00 pm (UTC)FWIW, I've never gone caving, and I was in an active troop. I don't know if it was a regional thing, or simply something that wasn't done when I was in the Boy Scouts (late 80s, early 90s).
I agree that it's probably due to ignorance, since packing out of waste usually isn't something that's done when camping or backpacking.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-05 05:02 am (UTC)As long as it's legal for a private organization in PA to have discriminatory membership policies, it's likely the city is going to end up on its ass in court. In the wake of California's gay marriage decision, progressive-minded communities all want to make a public stand in order to capture additional business or gain notoriety on the national or world stage, but the city appears to have bungled this particular attempt, unless they're simply doing it to be able to say "see look, we're progressive!" regardless of the legal outcome. The city are hardly heroes and the BSA are hardly villains in this debacle.
While gay rights activism is nice and all, I think anger tends to blind activists to the practical sides of the struggle. And I'm quite gay, for what it's worth.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-09 06:08 pm (UTC)